'Voicemails for Isabelle' Climbed to Netflix's No. 1 on a Week of Word of Mouth. The Tears Are Earned.
Zoey Deutch turns a creepy-on-paper rom-com about grief into the rare streaming sleeper that sticks. The premise is the problem. She is the answer.

Don Carpenter
June 26, 2026[]
"Voicemails for Isabelle" landed on Netflix on June 19 with almost no noise around it. A rom-com, a couple of names you know, a poster that could belong to any of a hundred interchangeable streaming titles. A week later it is the most-watched movie on the service in the US, and the audience number is running ahead of the critics: 91 percent on Rotten Tomatoes from viewers as of this writing, against roughly 84 from the press. The engine doing that work is not a trailer. It is people filming themselves crying about it and posting the footage.
So the question worth answering is whether the movie is actually good or just good at finding the soft spot under your ribs. Mostly the former. It works, and it works on purpose.
The setup, which sounds worse than it plays
This is the kind of logline that gets a Black List script bought and then makes the director sweat. Jill (Zoey Deutch) is an aspiring pastry chef grinding it out in San Francisco. Her younger sister Isabelle (Ciara Bravo) has cystic fibrosis and spends her life shuttling between home and the hospital. Early in the movie, before Jill can get back to her, Isabelle dies. Jill keeps calling her sister's number to leave voicemails, the way she always has. What she does not know is that the number has been reassigned to Wes (Nick Robinson), a slick Austin realtor, who starts listening to a stranger's grief and her dating wreckage and falls for her before the two of them have ever met.
Write that down cold and it reads like a stalker thriller. "You've Got Mail" with a death certificate. The whole movie lives or dies on whether you forgive Wes for not hanging up, and on whether the grief underneath feels real enough to outrun the gimmick.
What keeps it from curdling
The smartest decision writer-director Leah McKendrick makes is structural. She makes the dead sister the real movie and the romance the subplot, not the reverse. A lazier version uses Isabelle's death as a starter pistol for the Jill-and-Wes story and forgets her by the second act. This one keeps her present. The grief is the spine, the romance is one of the things that happens while Jill is trying to stand back up.
That choice is why the gut-punches connect. The early scene of Jill's mother repeating the words nobody wants to hear while Jill refuses to take them in is brutal in the plain, unfussy way that real bad news is brutal. There is a later beat involving the voicemails themselves that I will not spoil here, except to say McKendrick understands that the cruelest thing about loss is the small administrative indignities, the ways the world quietly deletes a person.
[]
Deutch is the reason any of it lands. She plays Jill as fierce and awkward and a little too much all at once, a person performing okayness with the volume cranked because the alternative is sitting still with what happened. She carries the grief constantly and quietly even when the script hands her a joke, which gives the funny scenes a floor under them. Sherin Nicole at RogerEbert.com clocked the same thing, crediting the film with "a real sense of the lunacy that makes life hilarious, even when we're hurting." That is the register Deutch is playing, and she rarely slips out of it.
Nick Robinson has the harder job, because Wes is the problem. He is a sweetheart written as a guy with genuinely wobbly boundaries, and the movie mostly trusts you to cringe at his methods and root for him anyway. Mostly. We will come back to that.
The supporting bench does real work. Nick Offerman turns up as a chef Jill files under "Temu Gordon Ramsay," and the movie is smart enough to ration him, so every appearance hits. Harry Shum Jr. and McKendrick herself play the couple who actually say the sane thing out loud when nobody else will. The soundtrack is doing more lifting than streaming-movie soundtracks usually bother to, with Robyn's "Dancing on My Own" recurring as a motif instead of a one-off needle drop.
Where it wobbles
It is a romantic comedy, so it is predictable, and it knows the shape it has to fill: meet, spark, will-they-won't-they, the big rupture, the run back. None of that is a knock. The knock is that McKendrick occasionally underlines her themes in pen when pencil would do. Jill literally announces "I don't need a man, what I need is my little sister back," which is the whole movie said out loud, and the movie did not need to say it out loud. A line about a love interest being "neurospicy" is the kind of thing that will date faster than milk.
And the Wes premise never fully gets the reckoning it is begging for. A man builds a relationship on a foundation of eavesdropping on a grieving woman's most private messages, and the film treats it as an adorable obstacle to clear rather than a real breach to earn his way back from. Your tolerance for that is going to set your ceiling on the movie. ScreenRant's Liz Declan came away convinced it "actually feels built for the big screen," and on the craft she is right. On the central ethics it is softer than it thinks it is.
The verdict
Here is the honest read. "Voicemails for Isabelle" is a better-made version of a thing you have seen many times, elevated by a lead performance that refuses to let the grief become wallpaper. It earns its tears instead of extracting them, which is rarer than the genre's reputation suggests. It is also a touch too pleased with its own premise to interrogate the one part that actually needed interrogating. If you have a sister, go in with tissues and lowered defenses. If you do not, you will still feel the floor give out once or twice.
That it climbed to No. 1 on a week of word of mouth, with no marketing engine behind it, tells you the audience figured out something the quiet rollout did not bet on: people will still show up, cry, and tell their group chat, if you give them a reason that feels true.
BCN score: 7.5 out of 10. A streaming sleeper that mostly deserves the noise it is making.
Sources (6)
- Voicemails for Isabelle (2026) - TMDBwww.themoviedb.org
- Voicemails for Isabelle reviewwww.rogerebert.com
- Voicemails for Isabelle Review: A Netflix Movie Fit for the Big Screenscreenrant.com
- Voicemails For Isabelle Has a 91% Audience Score. What Are Critics Saying?www.today.com
- Netflix's Voicemails for Isabelle is winning over viewerswww.primetimer.com
- Voicemails For Isabelle Reviewdeadline.com